Records on Time vs. Arctrieval

See how we stack up against Arctrieval and where the differences matter. Compare features, benefits, and value side by side to look beyond the sales pitch and find the right fit for your needs. Take a closer look and see why we’re worth choosing.

Capability
Records on Time
Arctrieval
Category Focus
Full-service medical-record retrieval combining direct EHR access, traditional provider follow-up, OCR preparation, and direct case-management delivery. Retrieval possible for 100% of providers in the US. Direct EHR access to 400,000+ connected providers, backed by a traditional retrieval team for non-connected facilities.
Self-service software that automates patient Right-of-Access record requests. It is not a managed retrieval service. Automates requests and follow-ups, but your firm’s staff still operates the retrieval process.
Primary Audience
Trusted by 250+ law firms; AExclusively focused on plaintiff law firms, including personal injury, medical malpractice, mass tort, workers’ compensation, disability, and other plaintiff-side practices.I-native since 2024
Supports multiple plaintiff practice areas, but its model is built around firms keeping record retrieval in-house.
Track Record
Built inside a high-volume personal injury law firm with 25+ years of operating experience; about 250,000 records processed annually.
Publishes individual customer results, but does not establish company-wide retrieval volume or completion performance.
Retrieval Turnaround
Same-day for eligible EHR requests after authorization, plus automatic fallback to traditional retrieval when EHR access is unavailable. Traditional retrieval averages approximately 21–23 days.
States that 90% of records arrive within 30 days. Complex requests can take up to 40-60 days.
Provider / Facility Relationships
Retrieval possible for 100% of providers in the US. Direct EHR access to 400,000+ connected providers, backed by a traditional retrieval team for non-connected facilities.
Users identify providers, while the platform automates correspondence and follow-up. No contracted facility network is advertised.
OCR and Document Preparation
Records and bills are fully OCR’d/searchable, compressed, quality-checked, organized, and delivered into the correct matter.
Offers document management and synchronization, but does not specify OCR conversion, compression, or a managed document-quality review.
Pricing and Recoverability
$49.95 flat fee per request; zero provider fees for qualifying EHR retrievals for an average of $100 provider-fee savings. Traditional provider charges can be approval-capped, and all fees can be passed through as a case expense.
Charge starte at $155 per month for one user on Essentials plan and $0.06 per page.
HIPAA and Security
HIPAA compliant and SOC 2 II, with encrypted, time-limited authorizations and secure delivery.
States HIPAA/HITECH compliance and documents security safeguards, but the reviewed materials do not provide a public SOC 2 compliance.
CMS Workflow and Integrations
Bilateral integrations with Neos, Needles, SmartAdvocate, Litify, Filevine, Clio, Casepeer, MyCase, Practice Panther, and NeoStella. Client, provider, and HIPAA data flow into the request; records, bills, costs, notes, and status return to the matter.
CMS integrations are listed only on Plus and Advanced, starting at $279/month. Names MyCase, Filevine, and Smokeball integrations and describes CMS synchronization.
EHR Access and Database
Direct EHR access to 400,000+ connected providers, same-day delivery when eligible, and automatic fallback to traditional retrieval.
Offers a provider-contact database for sending requests, but no direct EHR exchange or direct-access coverage count is published.
//run library popup code